Sunday, December 31, 2006

NO GOD EXISTS

I remember how I found out for definite that Father Christmas did not exist. I was about eight or nine years old and my mom was having a chat with my Aunty Sandra in the kitchen. Aunty Sandra was telling my mom about a horror movie she had watched. Apparently some kids in this film were trying to tell their mother that they had just seen Father Christmas, but because she "knew Father Christmas was not real" the mother dismissed them. I think this Father Christmas then went onto murder her, so that's a lesson for us all.

At the time it confirmed two things for me. Firstly, it confirmed my suspicion that adults were indeed making up the whole pile of horseshit about a man managing to shove presents down the chimneys of every house in the entire world in one 24 hour period. It had seemed unlikely for a number of years, but I had kept up a polite compliance in the idea out of a fear I would stop getting Christmas presents.

Secondly, it confirmed that my Aunty Sandra was a complete bitch. I think she knew full well that I was listening and that by casually revealing that Father Christmas did not exist knew she was snatching away a piece of my childhood innocence.

(she really was that type of woman. Fortunately we no longer have anything to with her and I presume she continues to live her life bringing tears to the eyes of small children.)

I remember too, the first time I realised that God did not exist. This time it was not my Aunty Sandra who gave the game away, but my English teacher, Mrs Hough (she of the hairy feet). To my shame I was quite old - seventeen - and we were reading Hamlet for A levels. I forget now exactly which part of the play it was, but our English teacher had to put some text in context of Christian belief at that time. This was something of a shocker to me. One of my many assumptions about Christianity was that Jesus had started it off and it had gone on the same ever since. If belief could change with time, even parts of a belief, then how it could it be truth?

Just this one question sent me off on the road to atheism. For the first time in my young little life I began to ask searching questions of religion and God and soon began to realise that all this, too, was horseshit.

(I will spare you the searching questions I asked and the answers I found that made me an atheist, as it would be less of a blog post and more of a slim volume of work. Perhaps I'll publish when I'm famous.)

With the arrogance of youth, I made an assumption that everyone else in the world would soon realise this too. No one needed to pretend to believe that a supernatural being was in charge of things anymore. We were a modern society. We had Duran Duran and Betamax. We were at the pinnacle of civilisation. We were brave and liberated with no more need of old superstitions.

Just the same as we grow out of believing in Father Christmas, I confidently thought to myself, we can't help but grow out of our primitive need for religion.

I think the time has come however to admit that, much to my puzzlement, that hasn't happened. If anything there seems to be more religion about than when Rio danced on the sand wearing her cherry icecream smile. The bloody thing is everywhere; causing all sorts of trouble that I believe you are probably aware of without me detailing. You'd think religious people would be embarrassed by the difficulties their faiths are causing, but rather than feeling the need to be slightly humble and apologetic, they just seem to be shouting at everyone that everything would all be alright if everyone just tolerated religion more.

"It's not us going around beating people over the head with a stick that is the problem, it's you being so intolerant of being beaten over the head with a stick that's the problem. Stop trying to bully us into stopping us hitting people over the head, accept us beating you over the head, and there will be no problem.
And besides, as well as beating people over the head we do really nice things too like visit old ladies and give soup to the poor. Therefore, shut up."

I think this is wrong. But it is hard to argue against religion these days. In the old days you were made to feel no worse than if you were an Aunty Sandra type. If you tried to tell a religious person that there was no God and religion was horseshit, however subtley, you were generally made out to be the sort of thug who would kick a crutch out from under a cripple. If people had a friend in Jesus, then who were you to malign that friendship? Who were you to try and take that away from someone? Nasty person. Just because there is no truth to what they believe in, doesn't mean you should point it out.

(I generally did anyway, and lost a few friends through it. Back then, speaking the truth seemed more important to me than friendship, now I have learned that a good friendship is worth keeping your gob shut for sometimes.)

Now however if you try and argue about religion you are aligned with the Stalinist regime or maligned as a racist. It is not only an act of thuggery these days, but you are singularly contributing to the type of climate that saw millions of Jews being systematically murdered across Europe in the last century apparently.

I look around me with bewilderment. Not only am I supposed to tolerate horseshit, but the reason I am supposed to tolerate horseshit is horseshit too.

These days stating the simple fact that there is no God feels like an act of sedition.

And I am tired, now, of arguing about whether or not there is a God. It is not up to me to prove a negative. If you are going to make ludicrous claims about supernatural beings running the world then it is up to you to prove that to me. And until you can prove there is a God, and no one has managed it yet despite the fact there are several Gods to pick from, then God is unproven and religion is horseshit and that's an end to that.

I am also tired of keeping quiet on this subject because I fear I may look intolerant. The fact is I am quite intolerant when it comes to people spouting nonsense, and the world might as well know it if it didn't already.

And so, dear reader, Scribbles' New Year's Resolution. Every time I see something in which God is talked about as if he actually exists and religion is talked about as something that is not based on nonsense, then I will hang it up here for all to see and do my act of sedition. I will point out that there is no God and that religion is horseshit. I don't mean to make small children cry. I hope instead to do my bit not to let total insanity and unreason overrun the entire planet. And we can't let Richard Dawkins do all the work.

I leave you with a quote from Goethe that I coincidentally came across last night as I was gathering thoughts in my head for this post:

"Truth has to be repeated time and again, as also the errors of the world are preached time and again, in fact, not by one or two, but by the masses"

Saturday, December 30, 2006

SADDAM HUSSEIN HANGED

It's happened. Saddam Hussein is dead.

I cannot imagine how the people who have suffered at this monster's hands must feel. I can hope it brings a sense of peace, but I don't know.

From here, his actual death feels an irrelevancy. He was dead from the moment they pulled his pathetic figure out of that hole in the ground. The fact that he is now gone for good may perhaps aid in the building of Iraq. Let's hope so. There is no going back now.

But the fact remains that he has done far worse to this world than we could ever have done to him. Not just his thirty years of tyrannical rule over his own people, but the legacy of his refusal not to comply with the UN. We now know he didn't let the inspectors in not because he had WMD, but because he didn't. He didn't want to be shown with his pants down. And the war that has resulted from this is sickening, seemingly without end and global in its proportions.

I wonder what would have happened had he never invaded Kuwait, had we never had to impose sanctions, had we never had to make him comply with UN resolutions. But then that doesn't paint a particularly pretty picture either. We would have let him carry on, wouldn't we?

So no rejoicing from me. Saddam was a problem and every solution to him was wrapped in explosives. Better to wonder what the world would be like if Saddam had not been a cruel, dangerous and merciless leader. That's a better picture. For everyone.

But he wasn't, and now he's dead.

Sunday, December 24, 2006

MERRY CHRISTMAS EVERYONE!


NEWS YOU MIGHT HAVE MISSED

Just incase you missed it amongst all the coverage of the startling news that there has been a bit of fog over Heathrow Airport, I should tell you that the Suffolk Police may have caught a serial killer.

NEWS YOU COULD NOT CARE LESS ABOUT

Fog lifts. People go on Planes.

I appreciate that the media has a duty to carry such news and inform those whose travel plans might be severally affected that their travel plans might be severally affected.

But that's a duty to inform. Not to scaremonger, go over-the-top and bore the majority of this country into the ground with twenty minute LIVE reports from the one single airport affected. So people have to sit around waiting to board their planes because of bad weather in a packed and chaotic airport. It's Christmas for God's sake. Is this really such a shocking state of affairs that it deserves top billing in the news headlines?

Next they'll be telling me that the Pope shits in woods.

Wednesday, December 20, 2006

ROD LIDDLE: WORSE THAN I THOUGHT

I was busy with a loft issue last night, but I did manage to catch snippets of the Rod Liddle programme "The trouble with Atheism" on C4.

Alas, I should have paid more attention because after watching it I still don't know what the trouble with atheism is. I have some grasp now of the trouble with fascism, science, Darwin's theory, zealots and several other things Liddle tried to bind to atheism.

But as for atheism itself, I don't think he said a word about it. It was like me saying I was going to tell you what the trouble with apples was, and then going on about how bad oranges, boats and photographs are, trying to make apples out to be bad by proxy.

Bizarre. In fact, if I had been able to give it my full attention, I can tell you with all certainty that I would have given Rod Liddle such a damn good fisking today he wouldn't have been able to walk for a week.

As it is, I direct you to An Insomniac who makes a very good fisk of it indeed.

Saturday, December 16, 2006

DO NOT PANIC! IT IS STILL I!

Yes, I am sure dear reader that you are disorientated at the sudden and dramatic change in the appearance of this blog.

You came here expecting the same old blue and white layout, and you are shocked to see the brand new light blue and white layout.

I understand you may be experiencing a frightening mix of fear and wonder, but I am sure that you will soon come to terms with the fresh look I have painstakingly constructed here.

After all I will be writing the same old crap.

A REALLY GOOD THING

The rain is coming so hard at the windscreen that the wipers cannot keep up and the view is one of blurred red lights in a haze of black. Familiar roads appear changed, without markings and edges. Wheels slip on a tarmac surface slick with oil and water.

A really good thing to do then is to drive really fast, overtake on the inside, and shove right up the arses of the vehicles in front who, for some inexplicable reason, are driving at speeds level to or even below the speed limit.

Exactly what is not needed on our roads on dark, rainy nights is pansies who try to drive safely in an effort not to kill themselves or other people.

They are irritating wimps.

They are naive.

They do not posses either the confidence or the skill of those who throw caution to the wind and bravely put the lives of other road users at risk. They prize safety over ego, over showing off, over getting somewhere fast. They are boring.

And they probably do not buy expensive specialist hubcaps for their cars and spend their Sunday afternoons polishing them until they can see their warped reflection.

Wednesday, December 13, 2006

NOT FUNNY

I am in the office on my own.

I have lots of work to do.

The damn phone keeps ringing with needy people all scrambling for their MPs help.

Then take a series of phone calls from a mad shouty woman who keeps yelling incomprehensible things about Labour's housing policy, putting the phone down, then ringing back up again. Concerned at last call as she mentions my colleague's name and address.

Phone rings again and mad shouty woman explains she is an ex-employee playing a "joke."

Ha . Ha .

Almost as funny as this.

SERIAL KILLER

A serial killer is someone who commits three or more murders over an extended period of time with cooling-off periods in between. In between their crimes, they appear to be quite normal, a state which Hervey Cleckley and Robert Hare call the "mask of sanity." There is often — but not always — a sexual element to the murders. All the murders must be completed/attempted in a similar fashion or the victims must have something in common, ex. occupation, race, sex, etc.

So called safe Red Light areas could not keep women safe from this type of maniac. Many years ago I read a report on the regular sadistic physical abuse prostitutes suffer. There's a theory that they are fodder for those whom we should now talk of as having an Antisocial Personality Disorder, but whom we generally label Psychos. Because the violence happens to prostitutes, it is never properly followed up, and these monsters are left to walk amongst us.

Who knows what hellish path this particular monster has been treading up until now. He's dumping fresh bodies right under the noses of a swarm of media and police, on open land or in shallow streams, in the same small area, over a very short period of time. Let's hope that this terrifyingly chaotic and impulsive nature leads to him being more easily caught.

Monday, December 11, 2006

PINOCHET DEAD

Good.

The bad news is that he died at a very old age, comfortable in a hospital bed, surrounded by his family, without ever having been bought to justice.

No doubt Thatcher will be shedding a few tears tonight in grief.

Don't think many others will.

Sunday, December 10, 2006

MPS SALARIES

The media are trying to get the natives out onto the streets with pitchfork and burning torch over the "fact" that MPs are supposed to be asking for a 66% pay rise.

As I understand it, MPs are asking for no such thing. But a couple of MPs have suggested that figure in their submissions to the senior salaries review body. Which is not quite the same thing as all MPs asking for it. But let us never expect the basic facts to stand in the way of an outrageous and misleading story.

Personally, I do not know whether MPs should get a pay rise. I do not know what criteria a job has to meet to be worth £100,000 and whether or not an MPs job meets that criteria. I do not know whether any job, other than important work like being a Pop Star or Glamour Model, is worth £100,000. I do know though that my boss, a backbench MP, works long hours, has to know about everything in the universe, and is at the world and his wife's beck-and-call 24 hours a day. Working out their salary on an hourly rate might prove they are currently good value for money.

One thing though that has come out loud and clear from the debate of this issue is that a lot of people do not know what MPs actually do. So I would like to take this opportunity to state what your MP cannot do, just so that you never bother their nice constituency staff with such a matter:

1) They cannot get you a three bedroom council house, with a garden, near your mom's.
2) They cannot come around and cut the hedge at the end of your road.
3) They cannot get any sane information out of the Home Office.
4) They cannot make your bus run on time.
5) They cannot get a British visa for the man you fell in love with in Tunisia.
6) They cannot arrest you neighbour because she called your daughter a slag.

Anything else though, go for your life.

Wednesday, December 06, 2006

FATHER CHRISTMAS SACKED!

Can you believe it? Father Christmas has been sacked because he made "offensive remarks"!

"We were able to identify the individual in question and having investigated the complaint thoroughly we terminated his seasonal contract on Tuesday." Said a spokesman.

What do they mean "able to identify the individual in question"? He's Father Christmas for Christ sake. There's only one and every child in Christendom knows his address! It can't have been that difficult!
He had asked one family of South Asian origin whether they should be shopping at a less prestigious supermarket instead... He also asked in a lewd fashion whether their teenage daughter fancied staying and sitting on his knee, it said.


I'm not being funny, and I'm sure we all don't want Father Christmas to go around putting people down and sleazing over young women, but to sack him for it? I mean, how the hell are we meant to get our Christmas presents now? I don't think this was very well thought through.

Tuesday, December 05, 2006

ALL I WANT FOR CHRISTMAS

Dear Father Christmas

For Christmas, I only want three things. Please deliever on or before the 25th December:

1) Chocolate Teapot
2) Square wheel
3) Trident inter-continental ballistic missiles

Many thanks and lots of love

Scribbles

xx

Friday, December 01, 2006

COME TAKE ALL I HAVE

Former British Airways chief Sir Rod Eddington has examined the options for modernising the UK transport network and decided that:

"Motorists should be asked to pay to drive on the nation's road network"

Sorry, I was under the impression that I already did that with the extortionate great big fat rip-off they call Road Tax.

If anyone should be made to pay to use the roads it's those who currently gad about on them without having paid said Road Tax. Those scroungers who cycle or ride on buses. They use the roads for free. How about tapping them for a few quid Sir Rod? Instead of rummaging your big fat banana-fingered hand ever deeper into my threadbare pockets.