Time is running out for the women of Iraq
In G2 on the 28th July there was an article written by Margaret Owen, head of Widows for Peace through Democracy and a member of the UK Bar Human Rights Committee. It began:
“If ever the women of Iraq needed support from the international community, the UN, and in particular, the UK government, it is now.”
As the piece explains, currently Iraq is under an interim constitution called the Transitional Administrative Law (Tal). Women’s groups in Iraq had to fight for this temporary constitution not to include rule 137. Rule 137 is an interpretation of the Qur’an that legalises polygamy; divorce by “talaq” (when a husband only has to say “I divorce you” three times to be divorced); honour killings; and stoning and public beheadings of women for alleged adultery.
Recently released drafts of the intended permanent constitution written by 46 men and 9 women state that the main source of legislation is to be sharia law. Sharia law rules that “personal status” (laws relating to marriage, divorce, custody, widowhood and inheritance) will be determined according to religious sect. This law will take precedence over international law leaving women unprotected by international human rights treaties and conventions, and rendering them subservient to an interpretation of Islamic law that assumes them as nothing more than the property of men.
Women are currently being beaten, raped, abducted and murdered in great numbers by religious extremists running rampant since the toppling of Saddam Hussein. Despite this, thousands of women congregated in Bagdad’s Al-Firdaws Square to protest against their exclusion in the draft constitution. They risked their lives to try and ensure that the democracy being touted before their country is not put forever out of their grasp. The bravery that must have taken makes me want to weep.
It is true that there are also women who are demanding that the new laws of their country be dictated by, and only by, the Qur’an. But I stand with the women who want to fully participate in the laws and decision-making of their country, who don’t think they deserve acid thrown in their face because they don’t wear a veil, who believe they have a right to education. Equal rights for women is no longer an untried theory or some sort of liberal utopian desire, it is an accepted and operating state of affairs in many countries and there is no argument against it.
In Victorian Britain science was used to keep the status of women lower than men in just about every domain. If it wasn’t our hysterical wombs, it was our smaller brains, or our fragile dispositions which kept us out of office and without the vote. In Iraq religion is the thing that is being wielded to keep women down. And yet religion is as religion does. Interpretation is all. It is possible to have a constitution which upholds religious law and yet also abides by international human rights legislation. What it is not possible to have is a country that is clutching democracy in one hand whilst holding women down with the other. It is democracy for all, or it is not democracy.
The deadline for the draft of the new constitution is the 15th August. The majority of assembly members have voted for a postponement to completion of the draft due to difficulty at coming to any consensus over such things as woman’s right and the right to life. Margaret Owen however expresses concern that “the Bush administration would clearly like to see all the deadlines, for the constitution, referendum and next election, met so that it can withdraw US troops”
This is why the call for help from the international community, the UN, the UK government, in particular Tony Blair and Jack Straw. The constitution of a country cannot be rushed and it cannot legitimise the subjugation of women.
I would like to help the women of Iraq at this crucial time. I’ll write to Blair, Straw and my MP Clare Short, but God don't you sometimes wish there was something more you could do?
Update:
Iraq Constitution. All the information you need.

