When experts attack: Killer theories
I've just watched the BBC2 programme Accused, which traced the events on Orkney when some adults were accused of running a ritual abuse paedophilia ring in the 1990s. It is a terrifying example of what happens when "experts" somehow manage to brainwash themselves into believing an alternative sense of reality, and with the wind of authority behind them are able to cause an extraordinary amount of damage.
It strikes me as the same sort of phenomena that saw Sir Roy Meadow causing havoc in our courtrooms, managing to break-up families and help put innocent parents in jail for the cot death of their babies, with little more than his reputation and a home-made wildy inaccurate statistic. His often ill-founded theories haved seeped into the culture of social services and child care and spread world-wide. His theory Munchausen Syndrome By Proxy for instance has seen many innocent mothers being jailed for having sick children. This is not to say that there are not cases where parents induce illness in their children, but that so many parents can be so easily accused of such a rare type of abuse, causing so many miscarriages of justice, shows the all-reaching power a mere theory can have
We see too the same kind of destructive processes of theory - that set professionals off on a path so diverse from reality that they cease being able to recognise it - with ME or Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. An illness that has demonstrable organic causes, that somehow got held hostage in the psychiatric sphere of medicine. The "theory" that this disabling illness is due to an aberrant belief systems (sufferers are ill only because they think they are ill) holds sway amongst the medical profession despite the fact that it is based on arguably flawed studies, and despite the fact that there is a multitude of tests that can be conducted on sufferers that will show up physical abnormalities.
This "aberrant belief" theory has its bases covered, as all good theories do. Wanting medical intervention is designated as a clear sign by this theory that the patient's illness is delusonal. And so in order not to encourage this "false belief" of illness, appropriate medical intervention is denied. Without the appropriate medical intervention the patient, of course, has no way of proving they are really ill. Leaving them vulnerable to accusations that their illness is delusional. A very neat, self-feeding theory.
Theories are a bit like viruses. They can infest whole professions, causing us to be in danger from agencies that are supposed to protect us from harm.
In the case of the Orkney island allegations, the people there were caught victim of the whole Satanic Ritual Abuse fad of that time, that started in America and spread around the world. Never believe that the hysterical witch hunts of previous centuries are not known to us today. It only takes a grain of truth, some influential and persuasive figure-heads, and the right context, and innocent people can very easily find themselves labelled by the authorities and see their lives go into free-fall.

7 comments:
That Orkney thing must have been the basis for that Brit miniseries in the mid-'90s--was it Flowers Of The Forest or something like that?
For anyone who knows a parent wrongly accused of causing/faking their child's illness, be it ME/CFS, or something else.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2087-2147749,00.html
Deadline extended until end September - look here
http://www.dh.gov.uk/PolicyAndGuidance/HealthAndSocialCareTopics/ChildrenServices/fs/en
Links put up in next post. Thanks anonymous.
Flowers of the Forest? Not familiar with it RobertG, I'm afraid.
I think it's more complex then the documentary made out.
The police have just released a report on the Isle of Lewis ritual abuse controversy from the same period, stating that ritual abuse was taking place on the Isle and that social workers did not remove the children from their abusive parents BECAUSE everyone was claiming ritual abuse did not exist - although all the evidence suggested that the kids were being forced into profoundly abusive practices.
So in Orkney social workers are damned for acting, and on Lewis they are damned if they don't. In Orkney, they are accused of following the "ritual abuse" fad and on Lewis they are accused of following the "there is no such thing as ritual abuse" fad. In Orkney they are blamed for listening to the experts on on Lewis they are blamed for not listening to the experts.
See what I mean?
And just to tangle up the threads a little more ...
I bought a woman to an emergency room last year after she'd been subjected to ritual abuse ... she had physical injuries congruent with the rape and torture ... and the attending psych (who didn't believe ritual abuse existed) claimed that I had injured her for attention and therefore had Munchausen's By Proxy.
I've heard similar stories from other people who provide care to ritual abuse survivors - that MBP is being used by medicos to dismiss physical evidence of abuse and blame it on the person who presents with the injuried party - because, to a doctor, MBP seems like a more credible explanation of the injuries then ritual abuse.
Because everyone "knows" ritual abuse doesn't exist ...
Is ritual abuse connected to those people who sometimes attack horses and cats?
I first thought of commenting by listing some similar cases here in Australia, but there were so many it has just depressed me. Just one: a few years back a woman was convicted of murder (when she was innocent) because 1. she wore home made dresses to court, 2. she did not cry, 3. the missing baby had a black dress.
She was pardoned after 10 years and I don't think her compensation was nearly enough. (Google Azaria & Lindy Chamberlain if you need the details).
Why do I think it is an 'anti-female' thing, like witch dunking?
Post a Comment